... COBOL's ALTER, deprecated 40 years ago and now often cited as the worst feature ever to appear in a major programming language.
How bad could this ALTER statement be?
Style is Substance.
Ken Arnold's Style is Substance argues that programming languages should enforce programming style.
Avoiding thesis work by writing an Eiffel version of Goldberg's Simple Genetic Algorithm. Appears to work but performance is disappointing: about half the speed of the C version. Turning off GC makes little difference.
chalst suggests scsh as an alternative to OCaml. My main interest in OCaml is as a language that I can write can code in as quickly as in a scripting language and compile to get high performance if necessary. (My real interest is in modelling protein structures which needs every drop of performance I can get). That said, I like the design philosophy behind scsh and the idea of embedding domain-specific little languages.
The only real reasons I prefer OCaml over Scheme is that it's statically typed and it has a reputation for being very fast. I'm not sure these are good reasons. Scheme programmers seem to manage just fine without static typing and Brad Lucier showed that, using Gambit-C, you could get performance equivalent to C from Scheme code for number-crunching PDEs.
I think I'm a Scheme programmer at heart but for mercenary reasons I've learning to live with C++ and trying to ignore my suspicion that using Scheme would help me to "beat the averages".
Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.