<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for tladuca</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for tladuca</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:45:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Apr 2003</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=9</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=9</guid>
      <description>Jesus, what have I done in the last 3 years? It sucks being one who is easily discouraged.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Sep 2000 02:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>6 Sep 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=8</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=7</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=7</guid>
      <description>Cool. Someone on the abi-dev mailing list said the best way
to learn its code is to start at a corner. Well my corner
has been the toolbar icons and buttons. First I learned how
brain-dead easy it was to change the icons, now I can see
how to change the layout, remove icons and even(in some
cases) change what actions they perform. Moreover I am
seeing how many different files can be related to one tiny
little feature. I also got around to sketching out the 1st
lesson of a possible AbiWord tutorial.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:21:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=6</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=6</guid>
      <description>For &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/miniver/" &gt;miniver&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;p&gt; I suppose for now we can debate accross diaries. :-)

&lt;p&gt; You said: &lt;blockquote&gt;
When I work for myself, I have the right to determine how what I build should be disposed; when I work for 
someone 
else, they have that right. If I don't like their rules, I can either choose to obey their rules, or work somewhere else. 
RMS appears to believe that he knows better than I (or the companies I've work for) do about how my work should 
be used -- I think he's wrong.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Forgive me if I misinterpret, but you sound like you feel RMS wants to control what other people do with your 
software. No one is deciding this for you, RMS may be urging you to do "the right thing" in his eyes, but it is 
&lt;b&gt;always&lt;/b&gt; your choice whether or not to use existing GPL software or to use the GPL license for your 
software. The GPL is about how &lt;B&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; use other peoples work, and if you so choose, about protecting how 
your work is used by other people. So perhaps I misinterpret you, but if not please explain how RMS is 
determining 
how what you build should be disposed.

</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 04:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=5</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=5</guid>
      <description>Today at work I witnessed yet another Windows protection
error. The technician who was working on it, was not able to
fix it. I dropped by and tried a few things but to no avail.
Did find a solution to the problem on Microsofts website
though. God forbid if there wasn't one there or the answer
would've probably been locked in "proprietariness".</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=4</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=4</guid>
      <description>test
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 02:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=3</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=3</guid>
      <description>Well, I can't code, but I &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; dick around with Gimp.
I didn't like a couple of the toolbar icons in AbiWord so I
made some new ones. Unforunately they're for some pretty
useless buttons that will probably go away soon, but I had a
lot of fun doing it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 03:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>What follows is my response to &lt;A
HREF="http://www.advogato.org/person/mrchrist/#1"&gt;
mrchrist's&lt;/a&gt; diary entry date July 31 '00.
&lt;P&gt;
OK, this is something that pisses me off a great deal too,
it seems like everybody's off doing there own little 
useless(to everyone except themselves) project, instead of
contributing to greater projects that are in great need for 
developers. It's like people learn just enough about
programming to do something that is fairly easy, like
cloning 
something that is already out there, or making yet
another(fill in the blank). Few people take that step to get
there 
heads around some large and complex project and help
contribute to projects that are much more valuable to the 
community, help fix bugs, add a little fit and finish,
whatever. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but it seems like a
lot of 
people's resources are being wasted on junk. I wish we could
somehow better organize and tap into these people's 
talents and time, funnel them into the bigger projects out
there. I mean shoot, lets get the major apps out the door 
first, then we can worry about our little pet projects.

&lt;p&gt; &lt;P&gt;
Anyways, you touched on something that's been bothering me
for awhile. Thanks! :-) Wish we could post this for 
open discussion. Actually I really wish we each had a
mechanism where other Advogato users could reply to our 
diary entries and have them show up.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 02:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>OK definitely don't like the fact that whenever you correct
an older entry it shows up as being new. Hope that can be
changed...

&lt;p&gt; Just was wondering why it is still after all these years to
write programs without bugs. I was using GnomeIconEdit that
I dl'd from Helix-Update and it was crashing all over the
place. Mozilla just crashed on me over something incredibly
trivial... well, I just hate the fact that's it's impossible
for us to "see" the bugs in our code until our programs
crash. I'm sure I will understand when I really start
programming! :-)

&lt;p&gt; This whole StarOffice GPL thing is pretty interesting. I
wonder wether it will help or hurt the development of
AbiWord. I won't even think about StarOffice until that damn
integration thing is fixed and until I can download and
install one app seperate from the others. I think of AbiWord
as the communities word processor, but well if Star is GPL'd
so it is kind of too. How will they interact? Will one die
off? Will they merge? Will they complement each other? I
must say I am suspicious of this whole SISSL(sp?) liscensing
issue.

&lt;p&gt; I see a lot of comparisions of Free Software to Proprietary
software these days too. People seem to hold them up to the
same standard. I guess that is OK, but it does not seem fair
to compare software built on a volunteer, community effort
to software that people pay big bucks for. OK, I am going to
shut up now, there are too many thoughts trying to get out
of my head at once!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/tladuca/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>This is interesting, advogato decided I can post diary
entries. How nice. Well, I'm still reading &lt;i&gt;A Book on
C&lt;/i&gt; by Ira Pohl, and I've read the very first part of the
GTK
tutorial at &lt;a href="http://www.gtk.org" &gt;www.gtk.org&lt;/a&gt;. My
goal right now is to learn
enough to be able to contribute to the AbiWord project, or
some other worthwhile project. I sure would like my PJB-100
to work under Gnome!

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;B&gt;&lt;TT&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; NOTE: THE FOLLOWING IS A "BRAIN DUMP".&amp;gt;
&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
DONT EXPECT IT TO MAKE SENSE!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;   &amp;gt;
&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;
&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
I've been following AbiWord development with great interest.
The dominance of Microsoft Word as always upset me because I
never felt it was really the best word processor. I think
that title belongs to Word Perfect. At any rate innovation
in the word processor arena has been next to nothing, thanks
to this virtual monoploy word has. At my place of work, the
only WP we support is MS word. If you use word perfect, you
on your own. We won't install it, we wont support it, we
wont fix it if it breaks. &lt;P&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; There is a great barrier for
people to try other word processors, namely cost. It's as if
the major WP makers want to make sure you have no money left
over after you buy there product. MS was $339 for their word
processor, hopefully leaving you with little money left over
to try another one. MS took advantage of the fact that
people want to share information, if there are no word
processing document standards, than the easiest way for
everyone to share documents is to have the same program. Now
Word is becoming the standard and no one in their right mind
would use another program if they are going to be sharing
documents with other users. That doesn't stop one department
where I work from using Word Perfect though. It provides too
many advantages over word for what they do. They make huge
documents and spend most of their time in the program, so
their department paid for the additional licensing fees to
have Word and WordPerfect. &lt;P&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Well, MS reaps the rewards of
having captured most of the market share. Meanwhile there
are no document standards, and most people are stuck with
Word. Enter Free Software, enter cooperation. We can have
multiple interfaces, standards. Programs for novices,
programs for experts, all using the same standard. No, you
don't have to fork over hundreds of dollars to have
professional functionality that you will rarely need but
would like to have there. No you don't have to do something
illegal to give your friend a copy so he can read your
documents or to use the software yourself because everyone
else is but you cant afford it, or because you have more
than one computer and you want to use it on both. That is
what AbiWord is part of. Everything is open. Nothing is
restricted. No NDA's. None of this "Pay us every two years"
upgrade cycle.
&lt;P&gt;
It is interesting to note that Eric Sink, the founder of
AbiWord, thought AbiSource would be a profitable company buy
supporting AbiWord. I think that is naive. If AbiWord is
free software, anyone has the power to support it, if its
profitable they'll have tough competition and good software
should not need support anyway.  it seems like the project
could use many more developers. I imagine mozilla has much
more time and effort spent into it. But it's all about money
isn't it? Netscape is paying programmers to work on Mozilla,
I don't know that anyone is getting paid to work on AbiWord.
You cannot escape the fact that this whole free software
movement also relates to Capitalism, our mode of economy.
Free Software just does not fit in. Everyone has to make a
living, so everyone works on AbiWord in their spare time.
Can our free community really compete with Capitalism? With
proprietary interests? For me, contributing to the free
software movement is about changing our society and where it
is headed.
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
