19 Sep 2001 stevej   » (Journeyer)

I (again) realized that just because I'm your peer doesn't mean that you are my peer. Therefore my commentary on circular paths of message distribution is bunk. I wish I had somebody to argue this stuff out with. I end up arguing myself from one corner to another.

Let me clarify; You are in my list of people to forward messages to. If I also happen to be on your list of people to forward messages to, then that's great. But it's merely coincidence if I am.

I'm starting to think that a static list of 5 peers is enough to scale me to a medium-sized network. I spent several hours tonight theorizing about self-growing lists based on various criteria, including fields in the wire protocol that tell you how many peers the person who forwarded you a message has. Unfortunately, everyone I could come up with would eventually force the user into a position of being peers with at least half the network on an elongated time-scale. That's no good.

Please mail me if this doesn't make sense.

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!