<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for ssp</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for ssp</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:12:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Jun 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=10</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=10</guid>
      <description>The weird thing about the &lt;a href="http://www.grillbar.org/wordpress/?p=278" &gt;decadence&lt;/a&gt; discussion&#xD;
is all the talk about how we made this "awesome desktop"&#xD;
which is like totally awesome and&#xD;
the only reason nobody uses it that they are just happy&#xD;
enough with Windows or OS X.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; The problem with that is that GNOME is not awesome;&#xD;
it is in fact a pile of junk where basic stuff &lt;b&gt;DOES NOT&#xD;
WORK&lt;/b&gt;. It is not not even competitive with&#xD;
Windows 95, let alone Windows XP or OS X.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Maybe &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; has something to do with why nobody&#xD;
cares.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 Oct 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=9</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=9</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Power Information&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; The AC Power has been unplugged. The system is now using&#xD;
battery power. To celebrate, let's frantically seek the&#xD;
harddisk for several seconds.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; "o hai i made u a notafication bubble"&#xD;
&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Sep 2007 09:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>9 Sep 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=8</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=8</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/devdev/default.aspx" &gt;An&#xD;
extremely interesting blog&lt;/a&gt; about algorithms, data&#xD;
structures, parallel programming etc.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:37:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 Dec 2006</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=7</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=7</guid>
      <description>&lt;a&#xD;
href="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/sysprof/sysprof-1.0.8.tar.gz"&gt;Sysprof&#xD;
1.0.8&lt;/a&gt; is out with a fix for an embarrassing bug that&#xD;
caused panics and lockups on preemptive kernels.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Jul 2006</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=6</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=6</guid>
      <description>Randall Hyde writes about &lt;a href="http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html" &gt;The  Fallacy of Premature Optimization&lt;/a&gt; and how Tony Hoare's original quote is widely misunderstood.

&lt;p&gt; Found via &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/default.aspx" &gt;Rico Mariani's blog&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>25 Feb 2006</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=5</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=5</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Wobble Me Harder&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Ever since Kristian introduced them in &lt;a href="http://live.gnome.org/Luminocity" &gt;Luminocity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http" ://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/xshots&gt;Wobbly Windows&lt;/a&gt; have been an indispensable part of the modern composited desktop. Now they are also available in &lt;a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RenderingProject/aiglx" &gt;Metacity/AIGLX&lt;/a&gt;, the compositing manager for the adult in you:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/pictures/wobble.png" &gt;
  &lt;img width=384 
src="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/pictures/wobble.png"
  &lt;/img&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; This is how they work:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/pictures/wobble-wire.png" &gt;
  &lt;img width=384
src="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/pictures/wobble-wire.png"
  &lt;/img&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Dec 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=4</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=4</guid>
      <description>The Composite and Damage extensions
&lt;a href="https" ://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5272&gt;don't&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="https" ://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5273&gt;work&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="https" ://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5274&gt;all&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="https" ://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5275&gt;that&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="https" ://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5276&gt;well&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>19 Oct 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=3</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=3</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Make it Boring&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.vuntz.net/journal/2005/10/19/328-make-it-fun" &gt;Vincent,&lt;/a&gt;   it's true that users don't get passionate about GNOME. But they also don't get passionate about Windows, even though you can get &lt;a href="http://www.download.com/Shell-Desktop-Management/2001-2072-0.html?tag=wf.2019.sbcat3" &gt;boatloads  of crack&lt;/a&gt; for it. Would users get more passionate about Windows if it shipped with a little pig that would sit in corner of the panel and sometimes make funny sounds? Would it be really cool if the pig was called Henry and was actually some internal joke from Microsoft?

&lt;p&gt; Sorry, but users don't give a flying fuck. Only people who &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; believe that "GNOME is teh best desktop environment on the planet" (and actually understand what the that sentence means) will think that Wanda is cute. It's not that I think the fish is really harmful. It's an easteregg and that's fine -- just don't kid yourself and think that it's building any passion or loyalty in (real) users, because it isn't.

&lt;p&gt; The way to get loyal users is to make GNOME reliable, useful and fast, write more applications like Evince, fix the session manager, somehow convince distributions that they should scrap Firefox and ship Epiphany instead, get rid of retarded "This application can't be automatically restarted" dialogs, make GNOME office competitive, first with OpenOffice, then with MS Office, and fix all the &lt;a href="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/interaction%20problems" &gt;annoying bugs&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>13 Oct 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://mces.blogspot.com/2005/10/gnome-terminal-performance.html" &gt;Behdad,&lt;/a&gt;  what is most likely going on is that your X server is running software fallbacks to draw the antialiased glyphs.

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; To draw one pixel of an antialiased glyph, the X server has to (a) read the existing pixel, (b) blend that pixel with the alpha value for the glyph pixel, then (c) write the result back to the screen. The killer is (a). Reading pixels out of video memory is really, really, &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; slow. Perversely enough, the better video card you have, the more likely it is that it has lots of memory, and the worse performance you get. 

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Try running the antialiased test again with 

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;
     XAANoOffscreenPixmaps       False
&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; in your xorg.conf file. This will cause gnome-terminal to draw to system memory which is much faster for antialiasing. Unfortuntately it will also cause other stuff such as painting the background to become slower.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Oct 2005 00:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Oct 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ssp/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Performance Lifecycle&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/default.aspx" &gt;Rico Mariani&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href="http" ://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2005/10/05/477470.aspx&gt;Performance Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
If you've ever heard me speak you'll probably remember me cautioning that the old clich&#xE9; ``Premature Optimization is the Root of All Evil'' often leads to very bad thinking like ``Just make it work the easy way first and worry about making it fast later.'' Now of course the reason that this is bad is that the most egregious performance mistakes are generally not in execution but in design and those mistakes are made very early in the project - it's important to have a design that is sound from a performance perspective. That means at least some consideration should be given to performance right away.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Sysprof&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/sysprof/" &gt;Sysprof 1.0&lt;/a&gt; is out. It's the profiler for people who don't care about profilers.

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Google Reader&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="reader.google.com" &gt;Google Reader&lt;/a&gt; is the first thing to come out of Google that simply isn't very impressive. It doesn't really work, and when it does, it's too slow. And tts user interface should be much simpler.

&lt;p&gt; I'd expect it to improve though; it does have some good parts.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
