<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for scottg</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/scottg/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for scottg</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2001 19:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>2 Aug 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/scottg/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/scottg/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>A user of the nsopenssl module was having problems getting 
the module to listen on the right port. He was sure it was 
nsopenssl's problem. I sent him an 'instrumented' copy of 
the module so he could see what ports the module was 
binding to etc.

&lt;p&gt; He came back saying he felt rather foolish because it was a 
problem in his configuration. It was something rather 
obvious, to which I responded:

&lt;p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;
If I could count the number of times my blind assumptions 
about where a problem lay have bit me in the 
butt, I'd have been without a butt for a long time now.

&lt;p&gt; What I have learned is that the simplest thing is (almost) 
always the answer. When I start repeating to myself, "But 
it has to work this way" then I know I'm in trouble and do 
some backtracking. The Universe, it appears, is logical. 
But we aren't.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; The amount of time he spent on this problem speaks to our 
ability to force ourselves onto a particular path even 
though it was clear to him that the problem was obvious, 
but he simply couldn't change his context to see it.

&lt;p&gt; Most things are pretty obvious, but we have problems with 
them, I think, because we make them more complex in our 
minds than they really are.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
