<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for phk</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/phk/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for phk</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/phk/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/phk/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>WhoaHAHAHAHAAH
&lt;P&gt;
I kind of suspected that some Linux geeks I had never heard
about would get upset because I fell in love with a Linux
Girl and it certainly didn't take long for these sorry
personages to prove that right.
&lt;P&gt;
Get a life guys!  and many happy returns :-)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/phk/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/phk/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>Neat idea this site, certainly a better system for assigning
trust than than slash-dot.  I wonder if the system should be
agumented to point out obvious candidates for seeds.  As it
is now the initial seed is quite linux centric for instance,
and that could effectively bias the ranks of people from
other projects.  This is of course partially the intent in
the first place, but there should be a way to nominate
central persons in other sub-cultures for seed status
(pending a manual review of course.
&lt;P&gt;
It'll be insteresting to see how this scales either way.
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
