<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for nealmcb</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nealmcb/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for nealmcb</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sun, 7 Sep 2008 01:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2000 20:29:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>22 Jul 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nealmcb/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nealmcb/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>&lt;strong&gt;Evolving rating systems: Advogato and
Slashdot&lt;/strong&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
The certification scheme here is interesting.
I'd like to see a more general purpose scheme,
and more information available for certifiers.
&lt;p&gt;
The Slashdot scheme assigns karma based on
more frequent feedback associated with
commentary.  It is thus nicely tied in with
behavior in the community (writing good
comments).
It also makes more use of the
assessments (by allowing users to filter content
by how highly rated it is).
Advogato is getting to the point where
scaling issues (number of comments on each article)
are important, and a moderation
scheme that is somehow tied in with the certification
scheme would be useful in a lot of contexts besides
the mission of Advogato.
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
