19 Mar 2005 msevior   » (Master)

roozbeh: IANAL but I'm pretty sure if the Free Software Foundation sued Red Hat in the US for GPL vioaltion, RedHat would win.

That clause is place because it is a felony in the US to export some classes of software to some Countries. Any contract that requires a signatory to do something illegal is null and void.

So a contract signed by someone to break a law (eg commit a murder!) is not legally binding. Similarly a contract (the GPL) which requires you to break the Law, (ie export some software to Iran) is not legally binding.

I'm not quite sure of your complaint about people stealing GPL'd work in Iran though. If the concept of copyright is not even recognized by Law what hope do you have of preventing people from using your work without attribution or compensation?

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!