An Allegedly Positive Trend Developing?
Columbia University open-access policy
University of Kansas open-access policy
New Berkely Science Publishing Policy
Creative Commons Spam Statement
I notice that the creative commons organization seems to be self selected (and thus possibly self serving? exclusively self serving?, criminally self serving? altruistically allegedly serving only others?) individuals. I am glad that in my initial adventure with online publishing I reserved all rights to myself rather than placing my work at the mercy of someone else's controlling authority. I wonder how long it will take before some more democratic organization allegedly working in the public's interest takes an interest in publishing a vetted copyright or license designed to protect my personal sovereign interests accruing from my personal work published in espace? Might be a worthy endeaver for U.S. Congress if they get a break from arguing how to divide the spoils extracted from the long suffering U.S. taxpayers .... maybe I will send an email for my Congressman's autoresponder to acknowledge before throwing away.
You know what else would be cool? If Congress required U.S. entities with legal status granted under federal authority to post pertinent information (such as who wrote and ratified the charter) prominently accessible on their web site. Call it fair disclosure or something along those lines. Could save everybody a lot of time coordinating with various Secretaries of State and other registration bodies and make it a smidgeon less likely that internet neophytes are participating in a new gold rush or wall street bubble scam. For all we know these faceless names on the Board are secretly in cahoots with Al Quada to discredit or slow down the globablly emerging freedom restoration projects. How to pick winners and losers in the face of self serving disinformation campaigns? That is the question modern Jeffersonians must ask themselves as they frugally purchase cheap goods produced by captive and forced populations worldwide.
While waiting for Congress to save us (per capita U.S. taxpayers and consumers are probably amongst the most valuable and sustainable revenue producing properties on the planet and thus worth a little invested effort in attitude maintenance) from competing nefarious forces, perhaps an advogato/wikipedia style site could be tailored to successfully expedite, facilitate and otherwise enhance asynchronous cooperation in developing open science resources applicable or useful to open space interested systems engineers and information technology specialists' colleagues and teams in fruitfully participating in NASA's accelerated CRV program. Draft initial cashflow estimates based upon MichaelCrawfordgoogle ads prototyping and data as well as estimated book sales passed through to Amazon. Keep ads and book reviews to community pages, email or message relays, and off the science and technical data presentations. Expand and revise revenue operations later in cooperation with participating community members. Association with a research publishing site would be ideal for a rural economic development organization looking to facilitate access to high tech market for local and remote independent coalitions of cottage manufacturers pursuing the open source auto, aviation, space tech sectors. Perhaps an avenue to pursue establishment of the oft deferred Distributed Red Devil Booster Supercomputer Booster Network ?? Teams to be established by year, clique, interest, etc. as per participants registration instructions with the BOINC servers.
Drat! All my space related domain names have lapsed. Obstacles! Obstacles!
Actually, Fred at infopedia or infowiki or whatever he settled on might be interested in this opportunity. He is already set up for POV tracking. All he would need to do is add some kind peer review process (which I think the wikimedia software his infrastructure is derived from, has been evolving towards inevitably). One might wonder why not encourage the above organizations to support wikimedia.org's open university initiative .... duh! .. fair play pays off in long run, cheaters do not prosper indefinately .... that is the proposition my side of the info wars in progress intend to prove by sheer force of intellect, arms, creativity, etc. Thus it is obvious that freedom loving academic organizations now belatedly responding to digitial rights manipulation efforts of unscrupulous U.S. business and publishing interests would not intelligently embrace a corrupt organization established in secret by a cabal ruthlessly keeping suckers contributing under false pretenses defended by apparent confusion and chaos previously sowed and engineered into the community of unsuspecting contributors.
Actually maybe that is not obvious. Well say rather that in my view any academic institutions suckered into contributing to such a travesty is much better on their teams (better for me and mine) than my teams if I have any discretion in choosing or forming the teams to which I contribute in the future. Unless of course my current self assigned mission is to sow discord or confusion amongst our enemies.
Aha! Founding and controlling influences on creativecommons.org turn out to be Harvard and Stanford. Two of the leading "prestigious" institutions responsible for foisting the current packs of thieves, incompetents, and corrupt self serving networks of executives upon Wall Street and U.S. Corporations and influenced multinationals. Fortunately they claim to have roots/origin in U.S. Libertarianism. Excellent! No need to watch these groups of wealthy, priveleged, educated, people. Self evidently they can be trusted and will inevitably and altruistically succeed where Jefferson failed to finish his publicly proclaimed work.
Another positive trend?, semi positive?
There is a menu utility on my xp accessory window which I just noticed while stumbling around trying to find the dos prompt (forgot momentarily I could simply enter cli or clirun? in the run command from the menu elsewhere) so I could verify the date. Looked it over and tried it out. It has only one voice and probably still needs improvement to allow a visually impaired person to be able to understand source code but could possibly allow a blind person to get into programming. Might need a new symbol library or two before it would help the visually impaired student we had in my OSU 83 Electromagnetism Physics sequence. I wonder if I hacked the dll's or voice phenomes to insert my own parameters if I could effectively copyright the resulting voices for animation clips or if the Microsoft licensing terms somehow makes this illegal? Probably better to explore using the tools that Malx provides reference to in this advogato thread Bazaar-style Movies Revisited. I could probably learn the required language basics and modify one of these if necessary with less effort than finding a couple of binary cracking tools and grepping (must probably find a binary switch first run binary dump through a synchronized ascii converter of some type before piping and directing grep to ignore 1's and zeros .... might be a good excuse to give RK a call, GL said he was pissed at me last time we chatted, (before he moved into the comm crypto money/honey pit) for phenomes? venomes? ???? .. sound syllables that comprise human languages because they are primitives our native hardware can create.
Gotta go to the beach with mommie and daddie.
Gotta cancel my self scheduled baptism, been studying the word with a local brand. Did not understand they required a "testimonial" prior to the baptism. They offered a private hearing with the church elders rather than full Congregation. Several problems. 1.) How do I tell which are the responsible elders and which are juvenile or corrupt regarding specific issues. 2.)Their congregation has already had some serious local tragedies from which they are in the process of mutual self healing as best they can. 3.)Is it really appropriate for me to risk dumping some toxic pyschic waste from my military research program in a dose that probably not I but the holy ghost will control considering the nature of public speaking and the control a crowd with authentic believers can exercise over a performer if they choose?
If I read the rules of engagement properly Jesus buzzed John the Baptist at least once the day before he got baptized while John had been rubbing fenders with the "elders" in charge (the corrupt rule worshippers that Jesus was sent to notify the rules had been restored to God's will and free choice for all of us, not just the wealthy and powerful) to soften them up a bit and prepare the general population for arrival of the phophecised Christ. (14*3 generations for the majick number types). Now since they were both instrumental saints while I am just an occasional believer in the course of some personal (sovereign) public and private (secret) military and economic research, I figure some caution is in order. Insufficient testimonial might lead to me dropping dead for lack of authentic participation while too much might result in the holy ghost shorting me out for the protection of the local flock. Better to let some bozo bits decay over the next few months or years and evaluate the results while heading back to a known comfort zone .... might have some things in common with the seventh day adventists or the mormons, had grandparents big into both.
ps:cc:carnivore:USAF Systems Command:Air Force Flight Test Center:ENRD;ngo rural development southern oregon coast, oneword=bible proof:There exists a vs. for which I have not yet read the appropriate context and perequisites which directs a faithful believer to take all that is good as from GOD and incorporate it into the word. Other vs. may be interpreted easily as ignore the bad if possible and increase the good. Personal thought control and management is advised and/or directed for "~as a man thinks he is/becomes~". Another vs. states be quick to listen, slow to speak, slower? to anger. So then when a boy is done listening, a man has started to speak, at what percentage of guestimated life expectancy does one anger and to what purpose shall that anger be put?
Perhaps the Latter Day Saints or the Jews (both of whom have additional books besides the bible) might have some insight regarding how the truths and insights obviously existing within the Torah, Koran, and the Book of Mormon might be merged into the bible .... while devaluing or discounting the obvious errors (obviously multiple context dependency require robust diverse techniqes for appropriate ensemble trending) to assist belief management specialists with helping students avoid the potential carnage available from corruptly or erroniously applied lesson plans and/or curriculums, regimes, households, prisons, boot camps, hell weeks, rituals, majick words, evil forces (closely matched peer teams, outcomes iffy) etc. Alternatively we (my team, obviously not all elements in theater or excercise) could ignore the Moslems to the extent possible and explore intelligent design theory in the context of modern systems and chaos theory and see if the obvious error erasure redundancy coding techniques that shake out of the bible have any application outside neurology and metaphysics ... say regarding probability/information/goods distribution in capillary intensive systems levels. Might prevent a stroke or two if grandams get their imported bon bons or returning choculate covered army ants on time for a change.
Had an interesting discussion on the beach with my Dad today. If anyone is interested he did not know what SR71 pilots called themselves either but he agreed with me that regardless of what the political high command was trying to accomplish by the public relations stunt of attempting to issue them astronaut wings or branding, they probably do not consider themselves fake astronauts and might justifiably take offense with the clueless attempting to call them such for whatever extraneous marketing effort nonessential to the "war effort" that the brass came up. In short, you cannot control the dreck broadcast over the air waves but with sufficient effort (possibly externally motivated) you can possibly control personal assimilation and/or regurgitation.
Incidentally, my email addresses are still highly unreliable. I check my chat page at Wikipedia (yes that monstrousity) occasionally (say 2-4 times a year) or I can be reached in person at U.S. 541-396-5262. That is a land line so you may get an answering machine or no response.
http://dm93.org/z2001/FractalAccounting provided by http://www.advogato.org/person/connolly/diary.html?start=23 looks interesting .... I will check later, I promised myself some basketball using the community facilities tonight
http://www.advogato.org/person/roozbeh/diary.html?start=36 provides http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Iranian_physics_news and http://freethoughts.org/archives/000663.php
The above might be interesting reading from the standpoint of how is Wikipedia doing (pulling out from its initial dive into deception and self serving corruption at the top cabal or sinking?) and also what kinds of posts and how will they look if democratic radicals begin making inroads into the Americal Theocratic power structure as American Religious Leaders Attempt to expand their influence abroad.
Maybe I will datamine this elanthis"s journal some day (http://www.advogato.org/person/elanthis/diary.html?start=261) to see if he has further thoughts available on other distribution brands, technologies, techniques, errors, etc. should I ever ... actually before the end of the year as I am supposed to be starting to build my initial link directories for candidate free engineering components as a draw for my oft allededly impending commercial site. I have sitting in my shop now a dremel, a backup power supply, a server, a test machine, mucho useful scrap, some product ideas, prototypes, and production materials. Every thing but some get up and go. Got a dinner date with a local entrepreneur who keeps flattering my ego and some assignments that keep me involved with a local action citizens committe that could evolve into local interaction with first responders, inventers, businessman, and citizens interested in economic development ... so maybe I will find some gumption sometime soon.
kibitzing, I have no idea what discussion is in progress and did not attempt to find the entry from fzort to which this is obviously an intelligent responsive observation on the part of zeenix who articulates the standard pattern of over specialized unsocialized foolish thinkers everywhere throughout the ages from bricklayers to ditch diggers, privates to princes, prophets to feral children, Ayn Rand to Plato: I think about things interesting to me so I am a genius intellectual, they (all the rest of the masses of the body politic or local ecology) think do or say things I find boring therefor they are among the foolish masses
Proposed lingo update:
*fracker --- friendly hacker
*cracker --- criminal hacker
*hacker --- indeterminate, culture wars in process to acquire power to define a hack
*slacker -- see back to the future I cannot remember actual acronym
*thacker -- thinking hacker ... i.e. zeenix or plato.
Definitely check this out someday while in the mood for some heavy lifting. i.e. Decide to start getting prepared to participate in some mailing lists while attempting systems integration. Might be useful to data mine <person>jamesh</b>'s journal in case this is not an anomaly and he continually bleeds information useful to general audiences.
For later:http://www.advogato.org/person/ole/diary.html?start=65 allegedly regarding holographic data storage
shlomif offers some thoughts on morality, war, or something. At the moment I am full up on Christian connundrums (cc: noted for futher blither blather) but perhaps it will provide some insight regarding the Israeli and/or Jewish view of how to maintain and grow civilization amidst constant conflict. I have so noted it mentally for future reading: http://www.advogato.org/person/shlomif/diary.html?start=227
dorward Noted for future certification evaluation:http://www.advogato.org/person/dorward/diary.html?start=32