The network is the human being
Nathanael Boehm wrote a nice essay last month called The Future of
Employment?, about a disconnect between workers' and employers' views of
social networks. (This post is based partly on my comment in the ensuing
Hacker News thread.) Boehm wrote:
When I need help with a challenge at work or need to run some ideas past
people I don’t turn to my co-workers, I look to my network of colleagues
beyond the walls of my workplace. Whilst my co-workers might be competent at
their job they can’t hope to compete with the hundreds of people I have
access to through my social networks...
The late Sun Microsystems taught us that the network is the computer.
It's true: we still use non-networked computers for specialized tasks, but
nobody wants one on their desk – it's just so useless compared to one that
talks to the entire world. Boehm could have titled his essay The Network is
the Employee. There are still tasks that people do in isolation, but the
ability to contact a network of peers and experts makes the difference in my
job, and many others.
The lone computer programmer in a small business has thousands of
colleagues on Stack Overflow, Reddit, and so on. It's a chaotic and
messy way to find answers, but it's better than the days when your only choice
was to call tech support – or smack the box with your fist, whichever
seemed more useful. I can't begin to list all the problems I've solved and
things I've learned by Googling for others with relevant experiences, and
getting help from a different expert for every problem.
Decades before the web, computer geeks had virtual communities for on mailing
lists, Usenet, and IRC. Now any job in the world has an online forum. Even
the night clerk at the gas station has Not Always Right.
Teaching has long been a solitary profession. Despite working in a
crowded classroom, teachers are isolated; they rarely have colleagues
observing or participating directly in their work. This has such an impact
that teacher education sometimes includes training in meditation or
reflection, to compensate for lack of external feedback. So I'm really
curious what happens when teachers start to work together remotely the way
You will be assimilated
Boehm's essay reminded me of a vague sci-fi-like idea I've been kicking
around: the first group minds will evolve from the intersection of Mechanical
Turk, virtual assistants, social networking, and augmented reality.
Starting around the 1990s, it was possible to instantly "know" any fact that
was published online. Since then, we've increased the amount of content
online, our tools for searching it, and ways of connecting to the network.
Today we have instant access to almost any published knowledge, anywhere.
The number of people on the net has grown too, and the number of ways to find
and talk to them. Most of us can contact dozens of friends at any given
moment, plus friends-of-friends, co-workers, fellow members of communites like
Hacker News or MetaFilter, and also complete strangers. Along with raw facts,
we now have access to vast amounts of human judgement, experience, and skill.
One result of this is the "virtual assistant," who provides a service that was
once available only to high-powered executives. The new personal assistant can
work remotely (often overseas), spread costs by serving many masters, and
leverage the internet superpowers listed above. Today their services are
targeted at small business owners and the Tim Ferriss crowd, but I'm sure
someone soon will start marketing virtual personal assistance to all sorts of
other creative workers, teachers, even stay-at-home parents.
So, how long before I can simply touch a button to let a remote assistant
see what I'm seeing in real-time and help me make transportation plans,
translate foreign signs and speech, look up emails related to whatever I'm
doing or thinking, or even advise me on what to say? Some of these queries
will go to my circle of friends, others to the general public, and some to a
personal assistant who is paid well to keep up with my specific needs. And
that assistant of course will sub-contract out portions of each job as needed
to computer programs, legions of cheap anonymous Turkers, or to his or her own
network of assistants. At that point, I'm augmenting my own perception,
memory, and judgement with a whole network of brains that I carry around ready
to engage with any situation I meet.
If nothing else, I hope someone writes a good sci-fi thriller story in which a
rogue virtual assistant subtly manipulates the actions of unknowing clients,
leading them to some unseen end.
Syndicated 2010-03-01 08:00:00 from Matt Brubeck