Kim Jong-Il is gone. That said, he continues to live on, looking at
things, on the popular blog Kim Jong-Il Looking At Things which
continues to be updated with new content from the archives.
Last year, my team Codex won the hunt. The reward (punishment?)
for winning is the responsibility to write the 100+ puzzles, (and
meta-puzzles, and meta-meta-puzzles, and theme, and events) and to
put on the whole event the following year.
So over the last year, I've worked with a huge group of folks to put
together this year's hunt which had a theme loosely based on The
Producers. My own role was small compared to many of my teammates:
I contributed to some puzzle writing and to a bunch of "test-solving"
of candidate puzzles to make sure they were solvable, not too easy,
fun, and well constructed. During the hunt, I visited competing teams,
verified answer submissions, and took advantage of my jet-lag from my
return from Japan on the day of the hunt to work the night shift
distributing items to teams.
To get an idea of what the hunt is like, you can check out a puzzle I
wrote for this years hunt. The solution is linked from the corner
of that page.
Back in 2007, Harpers Magazine published The Ecstasy of
Influence: a beautiful article by Jonathan Lethem on reuse in art
and literature. Like Lewis Hyde in The Gift (quite like
Hyde, as readers discover) Lethem blurs the line between plagiarism,
remix, and influence and points to his subject at the center of
artistic production. Lethem's gimmick, which most readers only
discover at the end, is that the article is constructed entirely out
of "reused" (i.e., plagiarized) quotations and paraphrases.
A couple months ago, I suggested to my friend Andrés
Monroy-Hernández a very similar project: a literature review on
academic work on remixing and remixing communities constructed
entirely of text lifted from existing research.
After some searching around, Andrés pointed out that Lethem had
essentially beaten us to the punch and linked me to his article. Only
after I visited the link did I remember that I had read Lethem's
article when it was published and loved the idea then. Over time, I'd
forgotten I read ever it.
Without knowing it, I had read, loved, forgotten, and then --
influenced, if unconsciously -- copied and reproduced the idea myself
in slightly modified form.
It seems that nearly all computer monitors have now switched from a
4:3 aspect ratio popular several years ago to a "wide screen"
16:10 and now mostly to an even wider 16:9.
But screen sizes are usually measured by their diagonal length and
those sizes have not changed. For example, before I had my Thinkpad
X201, I had a X60 and a X35. They are similar laptops in the same
product line with 12.1" screens. But 12.1" describes the size along
the diagonal and the aspect ratio switched from 4:3 to 16:10 between
the X60 and the X201. As the screen stretched out but maintained the
same diagonal length, the area shrunk: from 453 square centimeters
to 425.
But screens are not only getting smaller, they are also getting less
useful. The switch to wider aspect ratios is done so that people can
watch wide screen movies while using a larger proportion of their
screens. Of course, the vast majority of people's time on their
laptops is not spent watching wide screen movies but in programs like
browsers, word processors, and editors. Because most of our writing
systems lay out documents from top to bottom, the tools we most
frequently use to display (and then scroll through) the things we read
primarily use vertical screen space -- the dimension that is
shrinking.
If you have a desktop monitor, you might rotate the whole thing 90
degrees and "solve" the problem. If you're on a laptop though (as I
usually am) this is clearly not an option.
I am not the first person to be annoyed by this trend. In fact, many
recent desktop UI changes are designed to work around this issue. In
the free software world, both Unity and GNOME 3 have made
efforts to hide, merge, or otherwise get ride of title bars, menu
bars, and panels that take up dwindling vertical space. I use
Awesome which I've mostly set up to do two side-by-side terminals
with very little in the way of menu bars.
Applications are the worst offenders and the solutions for those
things that won't run in a terminal (or people that don't want to live
there) are still lacking. I have been using Firefox's Tree Style Tab
extension to move tabs to the side and hand-customized toolbars
that squeeze everything I need (i.e., back, forward, stop, refresh,
and URL bar) onto a single menu bar.
But the situation still drives me crazy. I'd love to hear what others
are doing.
Mika and I will be traveling this winter in the Seattle area and in
Japan. The current plan is to be in Seattle December 19 through 28 and
then in Japan from December 28 through January 12. After that, we
will fly back to Boston for the MIT Mystery Hunt where, as
punishment for winning last year, our team is running this year's
hunt.
We will be in Tokyo for New Years and then traveling around Japan for
much of the rest of the time. We hope to visit Hokkaido and Aomori and
to travel there from Tokyo along Japan's Western coast through
Kanazawa and Niigata.
We're still figuring out where we will visit and what we will do in
both places. If you are interested in meeting up for dinner or drinks
in either place (or in organizing a talk or meeting), please get in
touch and let's try to figure something out.
[ Certification disabled because you're not logged in. ]
New Advogato Features
New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser
code is live. It needs further work but already handles most
markup better than the original parser.