quick IP-tech-politics post (mostly candidate agnostic)

A long post on (very liberal) firedoglake about Obama’s local-level organizing techniques. Very long piece but worth reading regardless of your political orientation, as it seems likely to define how campaigning will be done in the future, and doesn’t delve (much) into the politics behind the candidates/movements themselves.

Key take-away: the campaign is trusting volunteers to take roles that would never have given to volunteers in the past, and using new communications technology (and training) to help coordinate them. Result: vastly increased reach and increased levels of participation and ownership. Parallels to self-organizing (potentially fragile?) open peer production communities will be self-evident to anyone who has participated in one of those. Money quote: “Movements aren’t built on individual people—they are built on relationships.” <!--<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><Work rdf:about=""><license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" /></Work><License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Attribution" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" /><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#ShareAlike" /><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Notice" /></License></rdf:RDF>-->

Syndicated 2008-10-08 22:41:08 from Luis Villa's Blog