<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for lkcl</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for lkcl</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:48:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>13 May 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=446</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=446</guid>
      <description>etbe: the only way in which it would be sensible for debian&#xD;
to "follow" a commercial company, with profit-maximisation&#xD;
at its core, would be if those commercial companies removed&#xD;
profit-maximisation from their articles of incorporation&#xD;
(and replaced them with "non-loss" articles).&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; social contracts such as those followed by debian&#xD;
&lt;i&gt;automatically&lt;/i&gt; conflict with profit-maximisation&#xD;
priorities.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; period.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; assuming that for profit-maximising companies it is far too&#xD;
difficult for them to be able to get shareholder's&#xD;
permission to change the articles of incorporation, the only&#xD;
acceptable option is for debian's release cycle to be&#xD;
followed by profit-maximisation companies, not the other way&#xD;
round.&#xD;
&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=445</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=445</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://lkcl.net/reports/dell.d430s.html" &gt;Linux on&#xD;
Dell D430&lt;/a&gt; - great machine, only &amp;pound;560 reconditioned.  2gb&#xD;
ram, 3G HDSPA built-in modem (!), 32gb Solid-State drive&#xD;
(!), dual-core 1.2ghz intel celery processor.  lightweight&#xD;
(my absolute limit has always been 1.5kg and this one's 1.3&#xD;
or so and it's got a 12in 1280x800 screen.  cool!)&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=444</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=444</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.linuxfestnorthwest.org/" &gt;o my god&lt;/a&gt; i&#xD;
think i just saw michael meeks or something vaguely&#xD;
resembling him ha ha ohhh dear i find a geekcam amusing ooo&#xD;
there must be something wrong with me&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:07:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>25 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=443</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=443</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/19677/OLPC_Might_Become_Windows_Only" &gt;OLPC&#xD;
scrapes bottom of barrel&lt;/a&gt;....&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=442</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=442</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://advogato.org/article/680.html" &gt;ohhh&#xD;
maaaan&lt;/a&gt; i WISH that professor yunus had written his book&#xD;
like... ten to fifteen years ago.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; dang.&#xD;
&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=441</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=441</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://advogato.org/article/595.html" &gt;*ROTFL*&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
what was i &lt;em&gt;smoking&lt;/em&gt;??? oh - i don't smoke, ha ha.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;tt&gt;(essentially, i was trying to express a problem for&#xD;
which i had no adequate solution at the time, and all i felt&#xD;
i could do was get exasperated.  now, of course, there is&#xD;
the tantalising possibility of a way forward: "social&#xD;
business", under which projects that actually "help people"&#xD;
can operate without the threat of having the social charter&#xD;
aspects of the company undermined by "profit maximisation"&#xD;
focus, from the shareholders...  but anyway.... :) &lt;/tt&gt;.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; i'd completely missed &lt;a href="http://www.osnews.com/comments/2421" &gt;this&lt;/a&gt; - six&#xD;
years later, it's a hoot!&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; my favourite quotes:&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;tt&gt;Is it just me or... does he really say nothing concrete&#xD;
in a very inflamitory manor? &lt;/tt&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;tt&gt;Pulleeez&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Dear Lord this was a sorry article. It would have made more&#xD;
sense in say 95-98ish years, but certainly not now. Linux&#xD;
has made enormous gains in ease of use and functionality in&#xD;
the last 2 years unequaled in this industry. Not mention its&#xD;
the fastest growning OS in the server space. Add the MONO&#xD;
project to that and we have a VERY real threat to M$. &#xD;
&lt;/tt&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; *ROTFL*.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; it's six years on, and *still* microsoft is 95% market&#xD;
share.  and yes, i had a beautiful way of driving people up&#xD;
the wall - of telling truth with nails in it...&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; ... there's a reason for that, which i will explain some&#xD;
time.  it's not pretty, but maybe someone will recognise&#xD;
some of the health-related symptoms in themselves (the&#xD;
technology-induced illnesses), and consider doing something&#xD;
about it before it causes their death.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=440</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=440</guid>
      <description>oof.  another &lt;a href="http://advogato.org/article/971.html" &gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in&#xD;
the series.  not the one i planned to write, but a&#xD;
spontaneous one highlighting the important questions of what&#xD;
the heck we are doing, as free software developers.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; let's face it: we're worthless and useless, are we not?  we&#xD;
are happy to write code which makes us happy and keeps us&#xD;
occupied and out of harm's way.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; ... yet that's not the issue.  the issue is that there is no&#xD;
business model in prevalent use into which we fit...&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; ... except &lt;a href="http://www.grameen-info.org/bank/socialbusinessentrepreneurs.htm" &gt;Social&#xD;
Business&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=439</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=439</guid>
      <description>gaah! i keep forgetting about things to write about.  &#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; distributed peer-to-peer ccache for distributed compilation&#xD;
of applications: a small device with a fast internet&#xD;
connection could easily assemble an application from source&#xD;
code with "make -j200" becoming commonplace.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; distributed debian distribution development - an extension&#xD;
of the above, in combination with debtorrent, dpkg-cacheing&#xD;
"objectified" with apt-cache search performing automatic&#xD;
searches.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; this is getting to be a long fricking list.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; oh good grief _and_ the "meta-project" too - a project based&#xD;
on object-orientated databases expressing relationships&#xD;
explicitly between needs and desires, allowing them to be&#xD;
connected to those that can fulfil them.   aaaagh! :)&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=438</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=438</guid>
      <description>ok - whew: that one's done, too :) &lt;a href="http://advogato.org/article/968.html" &gt;Technology in&#xD;
Warfare, for Peacekeeping and Peacetime&lt;/a&gt; is what I&#xD;
promised to write, yesterday.  actually, it was an idea I&#xD;
had nearly 18 months ago when I was working for the United&#xD;
Nations.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=437</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary.html?start=437</guid>
      <description>i have so much damn stuff to write!&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; about machine consciousness; about examples of how the "tech&#xD;
fusion" hardware and software combination can help the&#xD;
United Nations and NATO in peace-keeping, providing a&#xD;
combined role of both organisations; about how intelligence&#xD;
communities need to trust people (plural) more, and be much&#xD;
more up-front about their role and responsibilities...&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; whew :)&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
