[ Home | Articles | Account | People | Projects | FAQ ] The easy question was not answered by them correctly (even though we put there something from the homework assignments and despite the fact the exam was with open books and material).
The question I wrote was ambigious for most of them, so they wrote very nice answers, which answered something else. buff.
We have started planning the Welcome to Linux series (W2L), and decided on two new concepts:
A) Have all three clubs (Telux, JLC and Haifux) coordinate the series and Linux Days
B) Have parallel track of novices and experts.
A problem I've encountered, which I believe is common to many similar operations, is how to tunnel an untalented person to do the work he cannot damage. For example, a person X suggested to pass lectures. I personally think he is quite a bad lecturer, and will cause damage (I'm not the only one who thinks so, I saw him lecture several times, and in these times, nobody said he was a good lecturer, on the contrary). However, there are not many people willing to replace him, and even though I think he will serve the cause of FOSS better in dealing with other aspects of the Linux Days/W2L, I can't tell him in the face - you suck.
Suggestions?
FOAF updates: Trust rankings are now exported, making the data available to other users and websites. An external FOAF URI has been added, allowing users to link to an additional FOAF file.
Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.
If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!