Working with code
Riffing off Jonathan Lange on writing good (and reviewable) code (by the way, the filenames are a bit obscure, as in I didn't know review comments tended to be passed around in .diff files, but here's the 121kB review in question), a point I've been meaning to make somewhere, anywhere, for a while now: making large codebases grep-friendly is important to me. Specifically, when I enter a large codebase without any intention of becoming familiar with it (ie I'm fixing a bug) I really really really like to be able to grep for function names I'm coming across. (Really, I should probably use slightly more sophisticated tools, but they work on more or less the same principle.)
I was digging around in the Nevow codebase a couple of years for goodness-knows-what (actually, I think I know, and I really should look for it again, but that's not relevant here) and there were factories, factory-factories and factory-factory-factories, or something like that. It was very difficult to find the implementation of any of the many many objects that were slipping around my hands, because they were implemented with a totally different class name, or several of them, and then sort of assembled from pieces. Damn it's hard to fix bugs in code like that.
Syndicated 2008-04-21 07:34:34 from puzzling dot org: thoughts
FOAF updates: Trust rankings are now exported, making the data available to other users and websites. An external FOAF URI has been added, allowing users to link to an additional FOAF file.
Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.
If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!