<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for haruspex</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for haruspex</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Nov 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=268</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=268</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/etbe/" &gt;etbe&lt;/a&gt;: Neither. One should use ZFS (&amp;gt;&amp;gt; RAID).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>13 Nov 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=267</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=267</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Signs of the Apocalypse:&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Via &lt;a&#xD;
href="http://www.kirps.com/web/main/_blog/all/mit-releases-the-sources-of-multics-the-father-of-unix.shtml"&gt;Jos&#xD;
Kirps's Popular Science and Technology Blog&lt;/a&gt;, we learn&#xD;
that complete source code for the final release of Multics&#xD;
has been released by Bull Technologies and &lt;a&#xD;
href="http://web.mit.edu/multics-history/"&gt;made&#xD;
available&lt;/a&gt; by MIT.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Oct 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=266</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=266</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/bradfitz/" &gt;bradfitz&lt;/a&gt;: What was scarier&#xD;
than the text of&#xD;
the article - let's face it, we have known for years the man&#xD;
is a moron - was the photo accompanying it. A pile of&#xD;
sycophants, clutching their cameras for a chance to&#xD;
photograph the most potent symbol of their country's failure&#xD;
in every sphere. Not what he's earned: A lynch mob.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Sep 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=265</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=265</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/salimma/" &gt;salimma&lt;/a&gt;: "once" anti-GPL?!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:07:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 May 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=264</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=264</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/trs80/" &gt;trs80&lt;/a&gt;: Yep, swapping controller boards can&#xD;
work. I did it successfully last year to a Samsung 80GB that&#xD;
failed. Of course, I then had two working chassis and only&#xD;
one  working controller, so I should have been able to&#xD;
organise a warranty replacement (which never happened for&#xD;
various reasons). It was obviously a dead controller: one of&#xD;
the ASICs had a matchhead sized explosive divot in it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>15 May 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=263</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=263</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/mikal/" &gt;mikal&lt;/a&gt;, right! after all, where'd you think&#xD;
we^W they got the idea? :/</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 05:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 May 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=262</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=262</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/mikal/" &gt;mikal&lt;/a&gt;, I think everyone in a&#xD;
position to make a comparison knows by now that&#xD;
United are utter crap...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>21 Apr 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=261</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=261</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/louie/" &gt;louie&lt;/a&gt;: Yes, the "pathetic&#xD;
commentary" on&#xD;
low expectations due to Microsoft is indeed sad.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; But when you wrote,&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;No wonder everyone wants to move to web apps.&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; I initially thought you were being sarcastic: Because of&#xD;
course then, "this application may from time to time act&#xD;
like the web application it really is, and have&#xD;
unpredictable latencies or unreliable operation, ..."&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; But perhaps you were earnest, and were saying that people&#xD;
perceive web applications to be more reliable. Well, perhaps&#xD;
they can be a smooth experience, where your connection (and&#xD;
server) is fast, low latency and reliable. But in general&#xD;
it's not going to make the issue go away... Firefox&#xD;
is one of the few applications that crashes for me on OS X. :)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>20 Apr 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=260</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=260</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/Ankh/" &gt;Ankh&lt;/a&gt;,&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;f/1.8, which means the shutter of the camera can open&#xD;
very wide, letting in a lot of light but at the same time&#xD;
giving a narrow "depth of field", so that someone's face can&#xD;
be in sharp focus but the background be entirely blurred. &lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Well, an f/1.8 lens wide open allows you to maximise shutter&#xD;
speed, so presumably you're talking about very low&#xD;
light/slow film situations. (N.B. you have a typo,&#xD;
s/shutter/aperture/).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:27:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>18 Apr 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=259</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/haruspex/diary.html?start=259</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/lmb/" &gt;lmb&lt;/a&gt;, you might be interested in this talk:&#xD;
&lt;a&#xD;
href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/04/torture-secrecy-and-bush-administration.html"&gt;Torture,&#xD;
Secrecy and the Bush Administration&lt;/a&gt; given by Prof. Scott&#xD;
Horton.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
