24 Oct 2004 haruspex   » (Journeyer)

There is *no* pure-technical mechanism (framework/API) that can cover the differences between platforms
That's exactly what I said. But it is easy to imagine one*.

(Of course, there are frameworks that are platform neutral (wxWindows, Qt, GTK, Tk) although I have hardly used them, and clearly one of those has not predominated as an obvious panacea yet. I suspect a non-API "UI description", perhaps OO, may fit the bill eventually.)

*Because, as I mentioned, the UI - as seen by users - is by definition not concerned with platform quirks. Nor is program logic in general. And the ideal is not to waste people like raph's time with the dead-end coding of platform specific drudgework.

(update) mathrick:

TAINTACPUI - There Ain't No Such Thing As Cross-Platform UI.
That's exactly what I said. But it's easy to imagine one.

I hereby bow out of the discussion, I'm tired of being misread. [If you want to get closer to my meaning, forget about "APIs" (which are extremely boring) and think about "descriptions". The description is semantically platform neutral - again, by definition (sigh) - as is, for instance, the description of an algorithm. A platform-indifferent description of a UI is as equally possible as, for instance, platform-independent code, which we all write daily.]

(update 2) salmoni, thanks for providing an example I was casting about for - HTML is a description, not an API... Smug naysayers take note.

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!