5 Apr 2001 (updated 5 Apr 2001 at 06:44 UTC)
»
This ISP Must Die
Ok, I'm beyond frustrated
now. I've sent my last two emails to my
ISP. There will be no more.message
one and message
two
They have finally
managed to close off every single open port outbound and
inbound on their routers, and now I can no longer log into
them at all.
Apr 4 21:56:36 broccoli pppd[4192]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak
id=0x2 "Other Failure"]
Apr 4 21:56:36 broccoli pppd[4192]: Remote message: Other
Failure
Apr 4 21:56:36 broccoli pppd[4192]: PAP authentication
failed
Apr 4 21:56:36 broccoli pppd[4192]: sent [LCP TermReq
id=0x2 "Failed to authenticate ourselves to peer"]
Both of their support numbers
are busy 24x7, even though they're not a 24-hour shop. They
do not respond
to my emails, even though they guarantee a 48-hour response
time. I am being billed for this "wonderful" service, and
can't even log in to use it. Basically, I'm calling my
bank, and filing a
claim against them to have the charges they've made on my
account removed, and let them respond to *THAT* instead.
Palm Open Directory Syndicate: PODS
Well,
PODS is going well,
I now have 470 links (cleaned up some dupes) in the
database. All of these links point to Palm-formatted
websites, which can be used sans modification on the Palm.
I'm trying to clean up the
links and create a good schema to represent and edit them,
and then wrap that in a dmoz-like interface for managing
them. You can see an image of what it looks like here
And now the legal mess. What sort of sticky goop am I
getting in by publishing these links? Clearly this content
is not
linked directly from anywhere on the web, or if it is, it's
quite hard to find. It took a lot of URI massaging, google searching, and
some other means to
get this many links in there. It was so far, only a week's
worth of work. No "illegal" means were used to get these
links, it was all publicly available.
I keep falling into
more pandora's
boxes of links and jump sites to more links. I'm interested
in providing a broad range of content for the Palm users to
use (with Plucker, Sitescooper, and
similar client applications). I don't want to defraud the
content providers in any way, and in fact, I'd like to help
them. I've already received two
replies from people I've
emailed to ask for the location of their "hidden" URI so I
could point Plucker and Sitescooper at them.
[...]
The person I am speaking of was
graceful enough to allow me to use his writings but we have
an agreement that the
material not be distributed and he be kept anonymous. With
this in mind, I must decline your request. The AvantGo
platform does not allow copy/paste and is for this reason an
excellent tool to
slow down illegal distribution. I am not saying you would
distribute this but we need to keep a policy which can be
kept consistent.
[...] and another
[...]
As a content
provider, the nice thing about AvantGo is that I can insure
that the only people who access the "lean" content are those
using AvantGo. This insures that regular web surfers will
always use the
full version of the site, and therefore my advertising
revenues continue.
[...]
It's
interesting that they both mention AvantGo in here with
regard to providing access to
this "lean" content. I don't think making these links (all
470 and growing) public is in any way "distibuting illegal
content", nor would it defraud content providers of
advertising revenue.
Contrary to what AvantGo may believe, AvantGo doesn't own
this content, nor have they cornered the market on
distribution of "lean" content. There are better
alternatives out there, guys.
Any comments?
I'm interested to hear any and all sides of this.
Enough for now. Diary moresome later.