<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for dsf</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/dsf/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for dsf</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 04:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Sep 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/dsf/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/dsf/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>Here is my rant for the day:  compile time options are
bugs.  There is no compile time option that shouldn't be
converted to a run-time option, with the possible exception
of a few kernel features -- and I'm not too sure about those
either.  This issue has an important bearing on the debate
between the Redhat and Debian package management systems,
but exactly what it was escapes me at the moment.  Suffice
it to say that I can't see living with a system that doesn't
allow multiple versions of the same package to co-exist.
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
