Older blog entries for dalke (starting at number 32)

dyork: That Python vs. Scheme page is out of date with respect to Python. Python 2.1 (or 2.2?) added proper closures, with lexical scoping. Python 2.0 added support for collecting cyclical structures, with improvements to the gc API since then. (Eg, you can get a list of all uncollected references, since cycled with object which implement __del__ are not automatically gc'ed.)

In the meanwhile, working on documentation for one of my clients. Yawn, but it pays the mortage.

dyork? You can use Python-DSV but that effort is being merged with other projects to create the 'csv' module, which will be standard in Python 2.3. For more info, see PEP 305.

Thanks Cardinal! I just put a 'return false;' in the bit of code, so there is NO WAY to quit by accident. I'll just close each window one-by-one. See, I agree with Matthew Thomas on this -- there's no reason to even have a 'quit application'.

Anyone know how to disable "Quit" (Ctrl+Q) in Mozilla?

Here's how I work with Mozilla -- when something is interesting, I open it in a new window. When I finish, I close the window. I'm on a laptop and the mouse control is hard, so I press "Ctrl-W" to close the window. On the other hand, if I don't have time for it, I minimize the window, to read for later.

My laptop is up for days on end. Right now I've an uptime of 9 days. I'll leave windows iconified for several days, because I know I'll get back to them given time.

However, about once every 4 or 5 days I accidentally hit "Ctrl-Q" which is RIGHT SMACK DAB NEXT TO "Ctrl-W". This closes *everything*. All those pages (the ones I'm using for work and the ones I've saved) GO AWAY. There's no way to recover them. Plus, on restart I need to refix settings like "wrap-around search."

I can't find a way to disable Ctrl-Q to quit. I did find an essay by Matthew Thomas which says

It annoys people, because occasionally they choose ``Quit'' by accident, losing their careful arrangement of windows, documents, toolboxes, and the like with an instantaneity which is totally disproportionate to how difficult it was to open and arrange them all in the first place.

Elsewhere, he mentions Bugzilla thread on the topic.

Matthew is right. Quit sucks. I want it ripped out.

In the meanwhile, I'll try to switch to use Alt-F4 to close a window, so I won't accidentally his Ctrl-W. BLECH. The F4 keys on my laptop are too small, and if I hit it wrong I force my machine into suspend mode. At least that doesn't usually cause massive data loss.

19 Sep 2001 (updated 19 Sep 2001 at 01:21 UTC) »

Unbelievable. There are only two google hits for Kirby black beans. These are, IMO, the best canned, preseasoned ("Creole seasoning"), ready-to-eat ("listos para comer") black beans you can buy. I can't find them here in Santa Fe, so I restock when I'm visiting family in Florida. I'm out of beans and won't be back home for a while. Maybe I can get my Mom to send me a care package. Been years since that last happened :)

Mmmm.... Kirby black beans. Soul food for a Miami son.

My apologies in advance for the length. OTOH, I only post every couple months so it evens out.

I don't see anything wrong with our current counter terrorist policy. Rather, I don't see any good way to improve it, and I fear what's likely to happen will end up making things worse. Our policy is (was):

  1. make no concessions to terrorists and strike no deals
  2. bring terrorists to justice for their crimes
  3. isolate and apply pressure on states that sponsor terrorism to force them to change their behavior
  4. bolster the counterterrorism capabilities of those countries that work with th e U.S. and require assistance

Bush wants a "war against terrorism." What does that mean? Here are the 44 groups the US said in year 2000 are terrorists:

  • Abu Nidal organization (ANO)
  • Abu Sayyaf Group
  • Armed Islamic Group
  • Aum Supreme Truth
  • Basque Fatherland and Liberty
  • Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya
  • HAMAS (Islamic Resistance Movement)
  • Harakat ul-Mujahidin
  • Hizballah
  • Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
  • Japanese Red Army
  • Al-Jihad
  • Kach and Kahane Chai
  • Kurdistan Workers' Party
  • Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
  • Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization
  • National Liberation Army
  • The Palestine Islamic Jihad
  • Palestine Liberation Front
  • Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
  • Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command
  • al-Qaida
  • Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
  • Revolutionary Organization 17 November
  • Revolutionary People's Liberation Party/Front
  • Revolutionary People's Struggle
  • Sendero Luminoso
  • Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement
  • Alex Boncayao Brigade
  • Army for the Liberation of Rwanda
  • Continuity Irish Republican Army
  • First of October Antifascist Resistance Group
  • Irish Republican Army
  • Jaish-e-Mohammed
  • Lashkar-e-Tayyiba
  • Loyalist Volunteer Force
  • New People's Army
  • Orange Volunteers
  • People Against Gangsterism and Drugs
  • Real IRA
  • Red Hand Defenders
  • Revolutionary United Front
  • United Self-Defense Forces/Group of Colombia

The geographic areas listed under the "external aid" section: Iraq, Libya, Syria, "Islamic extremists in the Middle East and South Asia," Sudan, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Cuba, "reside in South America", Iran, Saudi Arabia, Western Europe, North America, "other Gulf and Islamic states", "Pakistanis and Kashmiris", "Central and South Asia", Europe, Asia, "Laurent Kabila regime in the Democratic Republic of the Congo", "sympathizers in the United States", Balkans, "Afghan Arabs and the Taliban", "Pakistani community in the Persian Gulf and United Kingdom", "Islamic NGOs", "Pakistani and Kashmiri businessmen", "Islamic extremists in the Middle East", "President Charles Taylor of Liberia", Gambia, and Burkina Faso. (elsewhere includes North Korea).

Take a look at the list of countries. Yep, people in the US help fund what the US calls terrorist organizations. Indeed, on May 16, 2001, Bush designated the Real IRA, 32 County Sovereignty Movement, and the Irish Republican Prisoners Welfare Association as "foreign terrorist organisations." Before then it was completely legal for US citizens to give them money.

It is believed that American supporters send hundreds of thousands of dollars to the [Real IRA] each year and that these funds are used to purchase explosives and weapons
    - Foreign Policy Association

Think the US is going to attack US citizens who fund terrorist organizations in other countries? Think the US will go after terrorist organizations in South Africa? In Ireland?

Hmm, just scanned the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. (Went into law in 1996.) Specifically, "SEC. 324. FINDINGS":

  1. international terrorism is among the most serious transnational threats faced by the United States and its allies, far eclipsing the dangers posed by population growth or pollution;
  2. the President should continue to make efforts to counter international terrorism a national security priority;
  3. because the United Nations has been an inadequate forum for the discussion of cooperative, multilateral responses to the threat of i nternational terrorism, the President should undertake immediate efforts to develop effective multilateral responses to international terrorism as a complement to national counter terrorist efforts;
  4. the President should use all necessary means, including covert action and military force, to disrupt, dismantle, and destroy international infrastructure used by international terrorists, including overseas terrorist training facilities and safe havens;
  5. the Congress deplores decisions to ease, evade, or end international sanctions on state sponsors of terrorism, including the recent decision by the United Nations Sanctions Committee to allow airline flights to and from Libya despite Libya's noncompliance with United Nations resolutions; and
  6. the President should continue to undertake efforts to increase the international isolation of state sponsors of international terrorism, including efforts to strengthen international sanctions, and should oppose any future initiatives to ease sanctions on Libya or other state sponsors of terrorism.

Who has power to say that something is a terrorist organization? SEC. 219. DESIGNATION OF FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS says it's the Secretary of State, but the designation can be overriden by an Act of Congress.

Under Clinton, the designation was a very laborious and difficult process.

So pretty much Bush can declare any foreign group to be a terrorist group and, using some of the $40 ,000,000,000 requested from Congress, attack said group in any fashion whatsover.

What's a terrorist? Go to http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/8/1182.html and search for "''Terrorist activity'' defined".

Interesting - looks like carjackers are terrorists:

(I) The highjacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft, vessel, or vehicle).

Scanning down further:

(V) The use of any - [...] (b) explosive or firearm (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.

If matters in the US are going the way I think they are, then we need to be very, very careful not to do things that, were they turned about, could be construed in turn as terrorism. Yes, perhaps we are justified, but it wouldn't be American.

One American ideal - treat others as equals. ("Ideal" doesn't always mean reality, sadly ):

As the sole superpower, it's too easy to ignore treaties, policies, and agreements we don't like. If this is indeed a foreign terrorist attack on the US we have to wonder what was the cause for this. Perhaps by not following international rules we end up making things worse.

We've got a justice system which can extradite and prosecute criminals. (Again, assuming foreign terrorists.) If whoever was involve hasn't been extradited, round up the evidence showing who did it and present the result to the world. (I'm reminded of Adlai Stevenson at the U.N. during the Cuban Missile Crisis.) That puts a lot of pressure on the host country.

But could they receive a fair trial in the US? I don't think so. Unlike, say, the trials of the terrorists involved in the American embassy bombings in Kenya or Tanzania in 1998, it will be hard to find unbiased jurors.

(BTW, in that case, two men were found guilty of terrorism and of killing 213 people. Their sentence? Life emprisonment. The jurors said they didn't want to turn the two men into martyrs. Yes, at least one was a follower of Osama bin Laden.)

If there's no chance of getting a fair trial in the US, the only solution I can think of is to prosecute that person in international court, as this would likely be called a "Crime Against Humanity."

But the US doesn't like international courts. (BTW, I'm not all gung ho for a single, world-wide system myself, except for limited circumstances. This counts.)

That idea assumes everyone prosecuted is a foreign national. Question: If a US citizen is prosecuted, is it at all possible to get a fair trial? (The news is estimating 50+ people involved and some having been in the US or some time, so it's possible.) Who could be on the jury but wouldn't have heard or been affected somehow by this disgusting event?

Tell me how I'm wrong. Assuming this was done by foreign terrorists, how can we use our military might (or covert operations, as allowed by law) to get these people? The only way I see would be to use them as police, not as a military.

This all assumed things weren't state sponsored, so everything can be treated as a crime - a heinous crime, but a crime. If it was state sponsored, then it's an act of war, and different rules apply. I really hope it's state sponsored.

Sorry, only states can legitimize crimes through war. In that, all states (or at least those who signed the Geneva Convention) are agreed.

BTW, what ever happened to diversity in Congress? Who can forget Jeannet te Rankin's voting against the US involvement in WWI (1 of 56) and against US involvement in WWII (1 of 1).

In the true spirit of democracy, once war had been declared Rankin promoted Liberty Bonds, which were sold to support the war effort, and she voted for the draft. However, she voted against the Espionage Act, which targeted foreign residents of the United States and suppressed dissent. [...] In 1985 a bronze statue of Rankin was placed in the U.S. Capitol

Regarding gary's comment on The ultimate hacker's car. I program so I can forget about things - I can forget how something is implemented because it just works the right way. I don't want an infinitely adjustable car, just one I like. Knowing how to tweak the "camber, castor and toe angles" simply does not interest me. I don't have a customized .emacs file. I haven't changed my app skins. Only thing window manager setting I've changed is to make the background black and have a "focus follows mouse" - in order to keep things more like the 8 years I spent using SGI's 4DWM.

Watched the Discover channel on cable a few weeks ago. (Don't have cable for fear of being a deeper thrall to the TV Fates. :) Couple of years ago I watched it when a show started on about severe storms. "Cool" I thought, expecting to learn more about how storms are formed. Nope. Sorry. It was a dramatic reenactment of a family who lived through a tornado. No science.

Then, two weeks ago I watched a show about storms on other planets, with ... dramatic reenactments of: "what would happen if we had dust storms like those on Mars?" "Storms like Jupiter's Great Red Spot?" "Flying (in a 727 I think) above a supercell in Jupiter's atmosphere?" Experience a coronal mass ejection 10,000 times greater than any ever experienced?"

Bleh.

Going to be in Cambridge, UK in a couple weeks, visiting EBI. Then to BOSC and ISMB. Bought luggage yesterday because not only is my only other luggage carry on size, but the handle broke just before my last set of trips.

Moths everywhere. Open a door and in come a slew. They love cooking themselves on my halogen lamp. I now know the aroma of toasted bug.

Been looking around for text search engines for the biopython.org project. I want to be able to do fast text searches of multi-gigabyte data sets, like GenBank.

So far what I have is the parser generator, which can identify the semantically important regions of the various formats. These would pull out things like "author", "organism", "accession number" and "description", possibly with the help of some Python code or with XSLT.

People would like to be able to search that data. Some of the searches are easy to implement, like a search for the identifier "100K_RAT." Others are a bit more complicated, like searching for the author named "Smith", as compared to "Smith, D. C." which would be the full text of an author field. Finally, people would like boolean and phrase search capabilities, like searching "'hoof and mouth disease' or 'foot and mouth disease'" in the description field. Some of the fields may allow stemming and some may not, although stemming is not a requirement.

All this data is record oriented and I have full access to the original data files (which may be compressed, so I wouldn't want to require access to the data to do the search).

The data is not in a form which can be handled directly by an indexing engine. For example, every record may have the word "GENE" because that's part of the format definition, but I don't want a search for "gene" to return all records, or ignore all records because "gene" got put on a stop list. ("Gene V" is the name of a specific gene.)

Instead, I can convert the input into a proper form and either call an API to say "here's the text for a new 'description' field" or convert the text into appropriate XML.

I would like to be able to update the database so modified forms of a record replace old entries. (There is a guaranteed unique key for each record.) This is needed for GenBank records which distribute a delta file every day but only do full releases every few months.

Finally, it needs to work on Linux, Solaris and IRIX and hopefully MS Windows and Mac (at least X). Python interface a plus, but I've done plenty of interoperability with command-line programs before, and with calling C APIs using Python.

Oh, and did I mention that fast is good? Ideally, simple lookups for some fields, like record identifier or aliases, should be blisteringly fast, while more complex keyword searches should be a fraction of a second. The system I have now, which only does exact match word searches is built on Sleepycat's BerkelyDB and does the lookup part quite quickly.

I know I'm not asking for all that much, am I? :)

I tried looking around for existing software which does this. I've used Glimpse before, but that was when I didn't worry about being able to search for given subfields. (The price of a couple thousand dollars is okay with me, so long as I can test it out before committing.)

The only program which seems close is Zebra, or rather a Z39.50 system in general. But I know almost nothing about those systems and it doesn't look like all that many people use that specific program.

A completely different one would be eXist which allows searches of XML fields using mySQL. However, I would like not to have a database system running because that makes for a more complicated setup. Plus, it is written in Java, which would put an undo requirement for a bioPYTHON project.

Any thoughts?

Have I ever mentioned how much I hate computers?

Now, don't get me wrong. I love programming. But I hate computers.

I replaced the hard drive in my computer about 1.5 months ago. It dual boots between Windows 98 and Mandrake. Why am I using Windows? Because I couldn't get the ppp connection working under Mandrake - it would stop anywhere between 1 minute and 30 minutes of use. The phone line would still be in use, but just sitting there making noise.

So I replaced the hard drive and upgraded Mandrake from 6.5 to 7.2. Thanks to the help of a friend, it went pretty smoothly, although I exlaimed "I hate computers" a few dozen times during that process.

Last Friday evening, Norton Antivirus kicked in and say the master boot record had changed and would I like to fix it. Admittedly, I didn't read the text too closely where it said "this could be caused by upgrading the OS" so I hit the "Repair" button. This replaced the MBR with the old and now invalid information NAV had saved somewhere. Which meant I couldn't boot my machine.

Did I mention I hate computers?

Please realize that I didn't and still don't have a good idea of what is on the master boot record. All I thought it did was wipe the boot loader, so I spent about 4 hours on Saturday trying to reinstall grub.

It wouldn't work. It wouldn't identify the partition but would say it was uknown and of type "0x83". This is strange because 0x83 is the ext2fs partition type identifier. Perhaps it's something to do with the "stage 1.5" loader, so tried figuring that out. Nope. Pulled up the latest CVS to see if that fixed it. Nope.

Started going through the code. Frustrating code. Global variables everywhere makes it hard to follow the thread of meaning. Various #ifdefs for stage 1.5 vs. stage 2 code. Mixed use of "grub_printf" and "printf". Using a statically embedded function as an iterator for a variable in the surrounding scope. Overuse of the for() statement so all of the checks for the end of loop are inside the for() so to have an empty body.

Anyway, I managed to track the problem down to a seven line conditional check for an if statement. Everything was find except for the last part, which was a superblock check.

It failed because the partition entry no longer pointed to an ext2 file system. This is a good thing. However, it didn't tell me why it failed and only implied that something was wrong with the filesystem type identifier.

After I figured out that the partition table was bad, I spent the rest of Saturday getting the machine back into shape. Managed to dig up some tools (like rescuept) which reconstruct the partition table information.

Even getting that going was nasty. Had to figure out how to make a bootable floppy. Used a Red Hat 7 distribution to get into a bare-bones Linux mode then figure out how "mknod" worked so I could talk to the different partitions.

But I don't know anything about partition tables. I managed to get the settings in fdisk to match the output of rescuept. (Used another program to double check, "s" something.)

Amazingly enough, that seemed to work.

EXCEPT!

Under Win98 I could no longer put my laptop into suspend or hibernate mode. No problem under Linux. The only thing that changed was the partition table. I had assigned the FAT partition for my D: drive an identifer of 0xB, but couldn't tell if 0xC was really the right one. (There are suggestions that early FAT32 needed special BIOS support, so I conjectured that perhaps a different identifier was used when that changed.) Changed to 0xC. Still no suspend. Conjectured that there was a setting changed in the registry.

There I was able to pull out my secret weapon, which was that I hadn't made all that many changes to Windows since I copied the files from my old drive to the new one, so I was able to export and diff the two settings. There were a couple of differences, but changing them didn't fix things. Replacing the new registry with the old also didn't. Doing a recursive diff on the two Windows' didn't highlight anything.

Windows running from the old disk can hibernate. So there isn't some PROM setting which needs to be changed. I backed up the /dev/hda1 partition and copied over the old installation. Should be identical code. But still Windows doesn't hibernate from that drive.

A friend of mine works for Microsoft. Called him up hoping he could divine why two almost identical configurations would allow one to standby and the other not to do so (even though it did the week before). His divining agents were no help. And he can't get his laptop to hibernate at all under Windows Me.

Did I mention I don't like computers?

While rereading the Linux man page for "fdisk" I see the comment "you should always use an OS-specific partition table program." So I played around with the Windows fdisk, which is a pale shadow of the Linux one.

Then I noticed a small comment on my worksheet. (Paper doesn't get a corrupted partition table!) It had the statement "in extended partition." Apparently there is a difference between "primary" and "extended" partitions and what I had used as primary partitions 2, 3 and 4 really should be extended partitions 5, 6 and 7. While Linux and Windows understood them just fine as primary partitions, I guessed that perhaps Windows acts differently when there's more than one primary partition.

Rebuilt the partition table to use an extended partition. When I used primary partitions I needed to specify the start and end clusters. When using the extended table I noticed that the start clusters were always correct. Figured this was a good thing.

Somewhere in here my FAT16 and EXT2 partitions became corrupted. Don't know if it was when I created the extended partition or playing around with the Windows fdisk or I forgot to unmount nicely or what it was. But I semi-ruined them. Remember that I said I backed up the FAT16 partition? It was onto the ext2 one, and now that file is in never never land. Also got the only time I've seen where fsck stops and asks for manual intervention.

Computers. Hate. Blech.

Managed to mount and save my home directory. It's about 3GB of which over 1GB are files from various bioinformatics databases. Easy to drop a GB on a 20GB drive. I must admit that nice feature of computers.

So now I'm in the process of reinstalling everything back onto my new hard drive. Didn't loose that much. I was very cautious about my email, so had an extra archive of that. Worst problem will be the final details of my Q4 finances, but even there I still have the paper copies.

Still, I've been working at this for four days, and learned a slew of things I didn't care about and would rather forget. Everything I did needed to be double checked because if I, oh, swapped an if= with an of= I would wipe everything. (I am able to borrow 10GB of space on someone else's machines, so I do have a second backup.)

I hate computers.

How to improve things?

First would be if Norton used the word "Restore" rather than "Repair" in that button I pressed which sent me on this nasty journey. I would really enjoy it if Norton has a "undo last repairs" option since I figured out there would be a problem before I rebooted. I could also have booted into Windows from a grub'ed boot disk to run that command.

Huh. When anything other than Norton touches the MBR, NAV kicks in to say there might be some virus activity. That would have warned me that something possibly back was taking place. I wonder how NAV recognizes self and if an anti-antivirus program could take advantage of that.

Second would be if there was no distinction between "primary" and "extended" partition. I bet it was some sort of hack to get around the 2GB limit in early hardware.

Third would be more verbose reporting information in grub, to say why it couldn't recognize a disk with a correct partition number.

Fourth would be better reporting in Windows to say why things failed - that is, an equivalent to the system log under unix. Hmm, I bet there is, but I just don't know how to find it.

There's probably more, but that's enough for now.

Don Norman is right. Computers are still in their primitive infancy. Will they mature in my lifetime or will there continue to be levels upon levels of needless complexity?

Don't come back telling my why things have to be done this way. Think of it as a challenge. People use software to achieve goals in their domains. How can you reduce (eliminate!) the need for knowledge unrelated to those goals?

Bear in mind too that I've been a programmer since '83 and a professional programmer since '95. If I have this much problem with computers, no wonder I'm not the only one who hates them. But as a programmer, they're the only game in town.

23 older entries...

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!