8 Oct 2001 chalst   » (Master)

I posted a question on Slashdot:

What are the realistic outcomes?
by Chalst on 08-10-01 15:14 (Score:2)
(User #57653 Info) http://achilles.bu.edu/cas
What are the realistic outcomes of the W3C/RAND process? Bruce Perens has
argued that RAND actually discriminates against open source, and argued for RF
(Royalty Free) in its place, but several well-informed people say that the W3C
is unlikely to adopt RF. If RAND is not ND (Non-Discriminatory) and RF is not
acceptable to the W3C, what else could happen?
Dyed-in-the-wool UNIX user, for all its faults.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]

Hope it gets answered, instead of the dumb questions that usually get moderated up.

gstein: Congratulations on getting (i) married and (ii) Subversion self-hosting.

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!