Wow, aryson is serious! 22 SEO spam bulletins together! A new sleazeball, or an old antagonist with a new strategy?
Who doubts that we are talking about 22 paying clients here?
Who doubts that we are talking about 22 paying clients here?
I saw a lovely photo of the newly engaged couple, though I have to say that Matthew looks like he has put on a bit of weight!
Impossible pathsI'm not very impressed by the smartness or helpfulness of answers there, so I doubt that I will get adequate responses. I should just read the standards, but I am not feeling unlazy.
Are there any legal paths in POSIX that cannot be associated with a file, regular or irregular? That is, for which test -e "$LEGITIMATEPOSIXPATHNAME" cannot succeed?
Oh, ... and a Happy New Year, Advogato!
Postscript
It turns out that /dev/tty/impossible is impossible, since
POSIX says that /dev/tty must be a character device file, and
I understand that paths can only be the dirname of a file if they are directories
or symlinks. The answerer I awarded my bounty on at SU didn't figure that
out, but he gave me a clue that helped me.
I have two thoughts about eval for guile:
It does so build up one's confidence into the accuracy of the reporting, doesn't it? John McIntyre notes, in Save money: Cut back on editing, a correction in the Washington Post:
A Nov. 26 article in the District edition of Local Living incorrectly said a Public Enemy song declared 9/11 a joke. The song refers to 911, the emergency phone number.So, which is your favourite Newspaper Of Record?
dmarti continues: But the fit and finish of the writing in peer media is often better than what cut-back Mainstream Media outlets can manage any more. I suppose that's good news..
Quite. When you compromise quality to save money, you save the most visible cuts, like checking whether words mean what you think, 'til last.
Simply marvellous! He got what can make not just tens, but hundreds online!
I would love to read his FREE eBook, but unfortunately I apparently would need to give Ian my email address, and I'm sure that must be against my principles.
It seems to me that the right response to this situation is to put less energy into solving bugs, and more energy into documenting the projects so that other FS types can understand the code. I think that a fair proportion of people who take bur reporting seriously are people who want to understand how the code works, and a fair proportion of people who have some grasp of how the code works will be willing to tackle items on a list of important bugs and issues. Get the interest to work for you, and not against you.
A feature that might help assuage worries about sleeper-spammer accounts would be to have the advogato.org/person/ list be ordered from most-recently modified account to least-recently. It then becomes much easier to write scripts to look for recently updated Observer accounts.
Currently the order of the people list is loosely based on certjuice. If we disallowed "/person/index.html" on robots.txt, then modifying an account wouldn't, in itself, attract search engine attention to a user page. Is there any interest in the current ordering? Would there be any other risks associated with the new ordering?
New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.
Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.
If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!