18 Jan 2005 cbj   » (Master)

So a couple of things have come to mind since I've started working on the tools again. One is despite the fact I have a mostly working implementation using a new bytecode reader library I don't really want to commit to supporting or introducing another such library into the pond of around a half dozen such libraries already in existance. It seems like a better route may be to try submitting patches against gnu.bytecode to remove the use of Class.forName() in favor of resolving classes through a programatically supplied classpath. I guess it means throwing away some work but hopefully all is better in the end. No response on the error I'm getting with gcj trying to compile cp-tools on the gcj list. Found something similar via google but it doesn't look good. I'm still convinced I'm probably doing something wrong since this is my first attempt at compiling anything non-trivial with gcj.

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!