<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for bcully</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for bcully</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2009 02:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Apr 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=43</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=43</guid>
      <description>Looks like the spam attack on advogato is evolving. Is&#xD;
codemastr the first sign of the spam singularity?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>12 Mar 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=42</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=42</guid>
      <description>@&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/Omnifarious/" &gt;Omnifarious&lt;/a&gt;: I completely agree about your&#xD;
ext4 rant!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Feb 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=41</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=41</guid>
      <description>@&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/Omnifarious/" &gt;Omnifarious&lt;/a&gt;: There's an interesting thread&#xD;
about that ocaml book on the caml mailing list &lt;a href="http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2009/02/a9af1ae442b97b574f435b8b31683341.en.html" &gt;here&lt;/a&gt;,&#xD;
suggesting it may have been plagiarized from &lt;a href="http://www.cs.caltech.edu/courses/cs134/cs134b/book.pdf" &gt;this&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
excellent draft. I haven't seen the book myself though.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Jan 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=40</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=40</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/davidw/" &gt;davidw&lt;/a&gt;: If you're put off by git, why not&#xD;
give mercurial a try? It's much more intuitive, especially&#xD;
for people familiar with subversion.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Jun 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=39</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=39</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/robertc/" &gt;robertc&lt;/a&gt;: for persistent hashes, I have been pretty happy &#xD;
with qdbm. I can't say whether it fits all your requirements, but it has been &#xD;
faster and more stable than bdb for me. Its successor, which I haven't used, is &#xD;
called tokyo cabinet and there are python bindings floating around for it. It &#xD;
might be worth looking at if you haven't already.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>13 May 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=38</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=38</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/jch/" &gt;jch&lt;/a&gt;: In case you haven't already read them&#xD;
(though it seems unlikely), I believe the &lt;a href="http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~mdw/papers/seda-sosp01.pdf" &gt;SEDA&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
and &lt;a href="http://capriccio.cs.berkeley.edu/pubs/capriccio-sosp-2003.pdf" &gt;Capriccio&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
papers both contain similar evaluations of web server&#xD;
latency, SEDA from an event-oriented perspective and&#xD;
Capriccio showing what can be done to improve the&#xD;
performance of a thread-based model.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:56:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>20 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=37</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=37</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/rillian/" &gt;rillian&lt;/a&gt;: 44 nano? &lt;i&gt;nano?!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>20 Sep 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=36</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=36</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/rufius/" &gt;rufius&lt;/a&gt;, as a Mercurial developer I would be&#xD;
interested in hearing what went wrong in your trial.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>12 Sep 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=35</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=35</guid>
      <description>ncm: I may be biased as a New Yorker and one of the more&#xD;
than one hundred thousand people who publically protested&#xD;
the war in New York City before it started, but I doubt you&#xD;
have any idea what "most Americans" think. Maybe you find it&#xD;
comforting to believe that the government wouldn't behave&#xD;
the way it does without the support of "most Americans"? I&#xD;
can see why, but it's unfortunately a bit naive. If you were&#xD;
American, what would you have done to prevent the invasion?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>12 Sep 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=34</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/bcully/diary.html?start=34</guid>
      <description>ncm: are you being deliberately condescending?</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
