<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for apply</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for apply</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 18:22:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>25 May 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>I posted a skeleton proof that P != NP on slashdot, but it's
still moderated at 0, while a bunch of speculation about how
difficult the problem would be is moderated higher. 
Interesting, no?  I've come to the conclusion that
slashdot.org is not a meritocracy, it is a wierd popularity
contest.  And that posting there is a waste of time.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>21 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Why Diaries Suck&lt;/b&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Diaries are for the poster.  You can post whatever you'd
like, and they are nice for informal conversation.  They
also allow you to keep track of and organize thoughts for
later. &lt;p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; However, these have got to be one of the most unfriendly 
formats for finding relevant information that I have come
across in some time.   Entries are not titled, indexed in
any way, rated, or anything.  It is just 2234509850907834
random posts to read through in a big pile.  For now,
Advogato is small, so the pile is almost of a managable size
for those with too much spare time on their hands to sift
through it all looking for the good stuff.  But that trend
won't continue for much longer.  Besides, even now it is too
much for the casual user to go read through all the diary
entries looking for something good.  In fact, I'd be
suprised if more than a handful of people read this entry. 
Searching, indexing, and bidirectional annotations are
desperately needed here. &lt;p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2000 17:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/apply/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>It appears that certification entries could use short
annotations when they are made.  That way we can find out
why ESR is a Dimwit, for instance, or why others like him. 
Then again, perhaps it will be meaningless information, as
everyone will just lie or skip the annotations part anyway. 

&lt;p&gt;   apply(Master)  ;; Best sex I ever had.


&lt;p&gt; Also, I'd like to respond to some things in the byte-order
thread, but 1)  I am apparently not qualified to, and  2) 
There doesn't appear to be any way to respond to other
comments, so they seem disconnected.  Anyway:

&lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;nether&lt;/b&gt; writes about an amazing type interface that
handles everything and is powerful.  Well, everything except
functions and objects.  It also doesn't appear that it will
handle dynamic structures or symbols, but that's hard to say
without an implementation.  It's not that hard to make up
yet another set of names for unsigned ints, the hard part is
handling functions, objects, and dynamic structures.  If
you've designed an amazing type system without these things,
you probably need a redesign.

&lt;p&gt; Several people suggested using text files.   Text is good
for smallish things, but 1) It inflates most data types, 2)
It's difficult to write real numbers precisely, and 3) It's
slower to read and write if you have huge amounts of data
(Conversion to strings is even slower than byte swapping and
unpadding data).

&lt;p&gt; My recommendation:  Use whatever formats are already
standardized, if you can.  CORBA is big and clunky, XML is
text and is big and clunky, etc.  However, portability is
more important in the long run than nearly all efficiency
concerns.  Also, my experience has been that if you start to
implement a cool new type system, you will end up with all
this cruft anyway.

&lt;p&gt; As an aside, it might be useful to have a byte or wyrd or
whatnot that describes the format of a binary file,
particularly temporary ones.  That way you can implement
simple ones as:

&lt;p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;
memmap(file, somewhere);
if (NATIVE_FORMAT != fileformat) {
  maybe_swap_bytes(somewhere, scratch); 
  maybe_unpad(somewhere, scratch);
}
if (swizzling_needed_p(somewhere) {
  swizzle_pointers(somewhere);
}
&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Since most of the time you will be running the program
locally, the formatting changes will fall through anyway. 
It's not clear where to stick this information though..  It
should be out of band so you don't have to copy all your
memory to make room for it before you blast a file out to
disk or across a network.  Also, not every object needs one,
just one per file or group of files.  NATIVE_FORMAT can be
used for network connections.
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
