<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for ajc</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ajc/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for ajc</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Mar 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/ajc/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/ajc/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>My main worry now is the migration of &lt;a
href="http:gildot.org"&gt; Gildot&lt;/a&gt; to a newer version of Rob
Malda's 
(GPL'ed) slash code. Localization is
very hard as there are strings hardwired all around. There
are a
few of our people working on it.
&lt;p&gt;
Gildot has been a success: it's target audience is only 10
million
people, but is is gaining momentum every day.
&lt;p&gt;
This past week we have been threatned with a lawsuit by
someone that didn't like some comments posted by our
readers.
A strong position assumed by us made him get back to his
senses,
but the doubt remains... Is a slashdot-like site liable for
the
comments of its users?

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
