It bothers me that the open-source backlash is going to start soon. Not one that really matters to most of us, and not one that will actually have an effect on OS (not that I can see, anyhow), but one that makes Microsoft's FUD all the more effective.
A few more Eazles will go out of business in the next few months. Some snide CMP columnist (E-[Buzzword] Weekly) will write a column about how OS is a failure, "obviously," because these businesses keep going under. A couple more months will go by, and yet another columnist will write about how the Linux desktop still isn't usable. Within a few months of that, there will be a general attitude in the press of "that Linux thing sure didn't work out."
You and I, of course, will know how much things have improved in [KDE|Gnome], and that kernel 2.4.X has made a world of a difference, and that Linux is a word ahead of where it was a year or two years ago. But now Microsoft will be able to take this attitude and use it against Linux 's functionality as a server, as well. And gradually, Linux will become known as the little operating system that couldn't. It won't be known as that forever, and, no doubt, it will grow out of that, and people will come around. But the development process is slow, slower than the press is willing to tolerate, I'll wager.
What will set all of this off, I believe, is these various OS-based businesses shutting down. There is no connection, of course, between quality of software and the success of a business. But try telling that to the folks at CMP.