15 Jul 2001 Svartalf   » (Journeyer)

I'm in a quandry- perhaps someone reading this entry can offer advice... Several individuals, myself included, are attempting to make DRI drivers for the ATI RagePRO chipset. Of them, I think I am the only one with the information to make it happen, and while I'm not under an NDA, per se, I have not been given permission to grant access to the technical data. ATI is being bull-headed where once they were nice to us- they're not giving any further access to the tech data to anyone that doesn't already have it. So, what do I do? Worse, I find out that XFree86, Inc. has made several NDA deals to get the information needed to make their drivers possible- and you have to have submitted several patches or something similar to be admitted as a member of the XFree86 project.

I find this to be more than mildly disturbing. It turns the project into nothing more than a free ride for the hardware vendors- they get drivers that they would have to do themselves (which they wouldn't have- they only have budget for Windows) and reap the benefits of the free labor.

Again, what do I do? Do I put the gory details of this up on Advogato, LinuxToday, or Slashdot? I don't know for sure- my gut level instincts is to let someone know all of the goings on for what they are; but I don't want to start another stupid flame-fest like the recent blowups with the GNOME and KDE teams.

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!