I just posted this to the 'themes.org'
article'...
I am generally dismayed by comments like this: "The
powers that be,
whose interests are completely separate from those of the
community
that themes.org serves, have decided..."
I was in NY for linuxworld & met a bunch of the
former
OSDN core people and general volunteers & what they had to
say was
just as forboding. Even some of the current
employees/volunteers had
nothing positive to say. (The SF guys were
still cool)
I have since begun, and this was a seed idea previously,
discussions
with many good, high-quality, yet lesser known sites that
live in
OSDN's shadow to form a strong organization by
consent instead
of by ownership.... from the 'working
doc':
*Create greater visibility for the entire organization
outside of
member sites. (Get out from under the shadow)
*Create greater visibilty for member sites within the
organization.
*Work together to share our individual gifts, talents, and
resources. (work together without owning J00!)
*It is recognized that each member's primary
responsibility is to
their contributing resource (website, company, or
service). No member
is expected or required to adversely affect their resource
in
advancing the network. (Do your own thing without
interferance)
*The network will recognize all members as equal.
Regardless of size,
resources, status or seniority.
*We will work by a social structure of respect. The
members with the
greatest respect will act as benevolent dictators. But,
one member
equals one vote on all 'official' matters.
*We will work openly on all matters and keep a public
record.
*We are an association by consent.
*We will be an inclusive organization. That is to say that
we will
happily agree to disagree for the purpose of working
together on our
common goals.
This sounds a little high minded, but it should playout
practically.
Sites work together instead of alone. They share
resources/talents,
whatever they can offer. And, do not give up
control of
their vision!
These sites can have differing opinions from each other on
content &
cheese off other members because they aren't ultimately
tied to each
other, but the differing views and opinions are
very healthy to
the organization.
For the record, sites so far are generally waiting for a
big player to
join before becoming official members. I get the
impression some are
still waiting for that sugar daddy that isn't
coming. It's not
1998 anymore guys. Back to basics!