Lately, I have decided to marry the two things I spend
any money on: home entertainment and computer hardware. I
want to upgrade to a (dual?) athlon box in the next couple
of months, abandoning my still-capable dual celeron 366
machine. I realized that I'm still going to have a lot of
parts left over from that upgrade. I am also moving into a
new apartment with my friends, and I will be one of the few
people with any money for setting up some kind of home
entertainment system. My goal for the year is to get a
decent mid-sized tv, and a dvd player. If I'm lucky, I'd
like us to also get a receiver and a 5.1 speaker system.
The downside to this is that I will only have a DVD player
from which to play music. So, I want to take my current
computer and turn it into an MP3 jukebox of sorts. The
goals/constraints are as follows:
Negative Certs: I have mixed feelings about negative certs. They may not be appropriate for Advogato, but in terms of a trust metric, they do make a lot of sense. Trust is not just measured in positive amounts. There should be a difference between ambivalence (Observer) and active distrust. If I have had a dealing with someone, and they acted in a dishonorable manner somehow, I should be able to publish that fact, to help others judge whether or not that person can be trusted.
As I've said, this probably does not make sense for Advogato. Ambivalence is adequate. Unless you think that someone stole code and published it as their own, and is a no-talent hack that has convinced everyone of their greatness, there is no need for negative certification. But I think that negative certs are extremely useful when transactions come into play. Any time someone actively violates a trust relationship, that should be noted. In the coming future of peer to peer transactions, I want to make sure that I'm only dealing with trustworthy people.
I had a kind of cool thought - combining UDDI with a trust graph, so I always find the best service provider. For that to work, though, negative certs need to be taken into consideration. Once you get to something like this, trust becomes more complicated. You have to consider *how* you trust someone. Trust is not all-encompassing. How we represent that is going to be an interesting policy issue. I could go on, but this is a rant for another day. ;-)
School is all done with now, and has been for a few weeks. I am now working for my school's IT department, in the Architecture group. It is turning out to be a pretty cool job. I am working on several Internet2 projects, like MACE-dir, eduPerson, and Shibboleth. The work is really interesting, and I am enjoying the opportunity to do design analysis and such. Also, a very nice aspect of doing work for higher education is that everything I write is Free Software. So it is a pleasant work environment.
I have also just started my DVD collection. I bought Almost Famous, High Fidelity, American Beauty, and Fight Club. Now I am in the process of deciding what other movies I should get, and what versions of those movies are the good ones to get. Beyond the annoyance with CSS and Region Encoding, DVD consumers are really taken for a ride in terms of releasing multiple versions of the same movie. Some movies have a normal version, a collectors edition, and an ultimate edition. I can understand a movie-only cheap version, and a special/collector's edition, but having multiple enhanced version is frustrating. And then you also have to consider quality of transfers, etc. I love the higher quality of DVDs though, and I certainly can't go back to VHS. I intentionally held off on buying movies until I started collecting with DVDs. To make myself feel better about buying DVDs, I am buying used copies off of half.com, so I don't support the MPAA's DVD policies. The flip side is that I am also not supporting the actors or writers, but they get so little anyway, it doesn't make a difference. Too bad I can't decide where my money goes in terms of royalties.
Until today, I've stuck to writing diary entries solely about computer-related topics and fairly light conversation. But, I really can't let myself ignore comments like this. I wouldn't feel very good about myself if I did. So, for those of you reading this that find this discussion off-topic, sorry. But, just like RMS says that economics is something to worry about once freedom is assured, the world of computers is something we can worry about once our basic human rights have been assured. I worry that some very smart-seeming people in various online communities are so involved with computers that they fail to see the world around them, and all of the very serious problems that need to be addressed. It is great to have strong ethics with software, but unless you also have strong ethics in the real world, it doesn't matter much.
It's been a long time since I've written. Oops. I have been pretty busy with school, and my life in general, to do much computer type stuff. I have been trying to go on MonkeyTalk every day and help out a little bit - it's nice because I can help a bunch of people with minimal effort, as most of their questions are pretty easy. MonkeyTalk is a great idea, as simple as the implementation may be.
I'm writing here to basically vent my frustration. Slashdot has an article slamming Ximian, Eazel, the FSF, and GNOME. These are among the few organizations that I have any amount of respect for in the whole linux "community." And it bothers me to see them slammed so unfairly. What makes it worse is that I can imagine how shitty it must be to be those individuals that such slams are directed at. Working really hard on something, and being proud of your work, then watching everyone rip it to pieces for no good reason can't be a very rewarding experience. As I posted on slashdot, I am becoming increasingly saddened by all of this. People care less and less about Freedom, and more and more in entitlement and things being no cost and convenient. It is becoming rather self-destructive. I wonder if it is people that have been (at least peripherally) involved in the Free Software world for a while getting somehow disillusioned, or if it is a new batch of people that never took the time to understand the tenets of Free Software so they don't understand how the dynamic is supposed to work. I think it is the latter. Ah well. I'm just going to try and let it not bother me so much.
As for my little Nautilus patch, I am having a hard time actually compiling Nautilus. It's complaining about me not having gtk and glib headers, even though I do. Hopefully I'll figure out what the problem is. It's annoying to not be able to do run-time testing now that I have my patch "complete" and without compiler errors. Once I have time I'll figure it out, and submit the patch. Then, hopefully I'll take on another little task that isn't too time-critical. At some point I'll have to write down a list of little things that annoy me about the software I use, and actively try and fix the problems.
I've been reading the available material on the Reef project - it sounds damn cool. I'm glad that it is clearly intended as a community project. It is great to see the ideals of the free software community, and their potential benefits, well-represented in web-enabled services. Once the semester is over I'm going to see if I can play with it a bit, and perhaps contribute some. My goal is to be a reasonably regular contributor to the GNOME project by the time GNOME 2 rolls around. We'll see how it goes.
New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.
Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.
If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!